Legal Opinion

Harper v. Johannesen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1962No. 8984PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Plaintiff (respondent here) in this action for damages caused by flooding of his premises was awarded $7,500 by the jury and judgment entered accordingly. This flooding came after a heavy rainstorm which occurred on February 8, 1960, resulting in a large body of water flowing from the drainage known as “Sand Hollow” in the southerly portion of Emmett Valley of Gem County. The defendant (appellant) appeals from the judgment and denial of his motion for new trial.

Plaintiff Harper and defendant Johannesen are owners of adjacent orchard lands. Johannesen’s premises are southerly…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Geurkink v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. GrasmickIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Holland v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Anderson v. MichelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Curzon v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Thomson v. MarksIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API