Weinberg v. Northern Alaska Development Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
This case has to do with the right of a property owner to interfere with the natural flow of surface water across his land.
The property involved is shown in an appendix to this opinion. The defendant (ap-pellee), Northern Alaska Development Corporation, owned land to the west of Morgan Way. While developing a trailer court in 1958 defendant filled in a portion of a ditch located on its property. This ditch, commonly known as the “Old Slough”, was a natural drainage course which gathered surface waters from the hills to the north and provided a run-off for melting snow each…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Doney v. BeattyMontana Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by27 opinions
- Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. DeetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- United States v. MilnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- McGlashan v. Spade Rockledge Terrace Condo Development Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.