Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Penrod

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1985No. 14664PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING

This opinion supersedes our prior opinions issued June 18 and July 17, 1985, which are hereby withdrawn.

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Water, that most precious of compounds, can be at once man’s friend and his natural enemy. So it proved to be in this case, as neighbor turned against neighbor in the quest for harmony with nature. The plaintiffs, Don and Florence Merrill, Mary Thompson and Ferol Adams, brought this action to establish their rights to easements across the property of the defendants, Paul and Alta Penrod. The Merrills claimed easements for the purpose of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Gibbens v. WeisshauptIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Casey v. Nampa and Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Roberts v. SwimIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Drew v. SorensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Chester v. Wild Idaho Adventures RV Park, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API