Legal Opinion

Loosli v. Heseman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1945No. 7248PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This action was commenced August 10, 1943, by appellants, owners of the SE%SE% of Section 32, township 9 N., R. 43 E.B.M., to quiet title to an alleged right-of-way or easement for drainage of irrigation waste water from their land onto and across land of respondent adjoining that of appellants on the west. The answer of respondent puts in issue the material allegations of the complaint incident to said alleged easement, and respondent’s cross complaint alleges that he is the owner of the SW%SE% and the Ei/oSWi/j, 0f said Section 32, township 9 N., R. 43 E.B.M., over which appellants seek an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Livingston v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Checketts v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Blaisdell v. StephensNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Crosier v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hodgins v. SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Summers v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Andrus v. IrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Burgess v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API