Legal Opinion

Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1990No. 18076Published

1Opinion of the Court

792 P.2d 926 (1990)

117 Idaho 901

Wayne KUNZ; Olive Kunz; Glenn V. Turner; Carol Turner, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 18076.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

April 3, 1990.

Racine, Olson, Nye, Cooper & Budge, Pocatello, for appellants. Louis F. Racine, Jr., argued.

Merrill & Merrill, Pocatello, for respondent. Stephen S. Dunn argued.

Webb, Burton, Carlson, Pedersen & Webb, Twin Falls, for amicus Salmon River Canal Co. Lloyd J. Webb argued.

Hon. Jim Jones, Attorney General, Boise, for amicus Department of Water Resources. Deputy Atty. Gen. John W. Homan argued.

BAK…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Boise Development Co. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Donnelly v. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Van Camp v. EmeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1907

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API