Legal Opinion

Pieper v. Commercial Underwriters Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1997No. B106201PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

Introduction

Plaintiffs, cross-defendants, and appellants James Pieper and Jeanne Ellen Pieper (the Piepers) appeal from judgment entered in favor of defendant, cross-complainant and respondent Commercial Underwriters Insurance Company (CUI).

The action arose from the Old Topanga Canyon fire, which destroyed the Piepers’ collection of rare ceremonial masks. The Piepers filed a claim with CUI under their “all risks” policy. CUI denied coverage pursuant to a “brush fire” exclusion. The Piepers filed an action for breach of insurance contract and for bad faith contending that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. MRI Healthcare Center of Glendale, Inc. v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Stamm Theatres, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API