Legal Opinion

MRI Healthcare Center of Glendale, Inc. v. State Farm General Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 2010No. B213985PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLIER, J.

MRI Healthcare Center of Glendale, Inc. (MHC), appeals from a judgment entered by the superior court after it denied MHC’s motion for summary judgment and granted respondent State Farm General Insurance Company’s (State Farm) cross-motion for summary judgment. The action arises from State Farm’s denial of MHC’s claim under a business insurance policy for loss as a result of claimed damage to its MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) machine and loss of income after the machine failed to satisfactorily “ramp up” after it was “ramped down.”

MHC asserts triable issues of fact precluded…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Pyramid Technologies, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  4. Universal Image Productions v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Jackson v. AEG Live, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API