Legal Opinion

Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1989No. S.F. 25060PublishedCited by 228 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

We granted review to consider the Court of Appeal’s reversal of a directed verdict of coverage in favor of Jack and Rita Garvey (hereafter plaintiffs). We sought to resolve some of the confusion that has arisen regarding insurance coverage under the “all risk” section of a homeowner’s insurance policy when loss to an insured’s property can be attributed to two causes, one of which is a nonexcluded peril, and the other an excluded peril.

In recent years, some courts have misinterpreted and misapplied our decisions in Sabella v. Wisler (1963) 59 Cal.2d 21 [27 Cal.Rptr. 689,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Johansen v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by228 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

223 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API