Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Allstate Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 2004No. B164112PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Appellant Mary Ann Jordan seeks the reversal of a summary judgment granted to the respondent Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) on her first amended complaint for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and declaratory relief. The trial court determined that the homeowner’s insurance policy issued by Allstate to Jordan did not provide coverage for the loss she had sustained as the result of the alleged “collapse” of a portion of her Santa Monica home.

By its terms, the policy expressly provided “additional coverage” for any loss…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. 401 Fourth Street, Inc. v. Investors Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Amerigraphics, Inc. v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Sapiro v. Encompass InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  5. In re ABM Indus. Overtime Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API