State v. Prather
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KIDWELL, Justice.
This ease involves an appeal from the decision of a district court, interpreting the meaning of I.C. § 18-918(3). On appeal, the defendant claims that the statute is unconstitutionally vague and should be overturned, and that it improperly shifts the burden of proof. The decision of the district eourt is affirmed.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On July 8, 1998, Bryon E. Prather was charged by criminal complaint with “Domestic Violence In The Presence Of A Child,” in violation of I.C. § 18-918(3) and I.C. § 18-918(7)(b). On December 18, 1998, Prather filed a motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BittIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Elias-Cruz v. Idaho Department of TransportationIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Regan v. DenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. DolsbyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. RansomIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.