Legal Opinion

State v. Cobb

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1998No. 23898, 23994PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, Justice

In these consolidated appeals, we review the constitutionality of a Boise City ordinance proscribing disorderly conduct, under which Diane Cobb, Tyrone Hutchings and Donald Farley were separately charged. The charges were dismissed by the magistrates assigned to the respective cases when the ordinance was found by the magistrates to be unconstitutional, and the State appealed the dismissal orders to the district court. In separate opinions by two district judges, the constitutionality of the ordinance was upheld, and the magistrates’ decisions were reversed.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Dia…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. KorsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API