Legal Opinion

Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1990No. 17471PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

David Olsen (hereafter “Olsen”) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Summary judgment was granted on the basis that Olsen’s cause of action was foreclosed by the Idaho products liability statute of repose, I.C. § [6-1403], 6-1303,1 which creates a rebuttable presumption that a product’s “useful safe life” has expired in those claims that involve harm or injury occurring more than ten years after time of delivery. Under the statute, failure to rebut the presumption with clear and convincing evidence bars a claim.

Olsen was…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API