State v. Ransom
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HART, Judge Pro Tem.
Heath Cary Ransom appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence for voluntary manslaughter, I.C. § 18-4006(1). Ransom raises as issues whether: (1) the district court abused its discretion when it excluded expert testimony regarding the effects of intoxication on the human body; (2) I.C. § 18-116, which precludes consideration of voluntary intoxicated condition in determining criminal intent, is unconstitutional; (3) the district court erred in refusing to give an involuntary manslaughter instruction; and (4) the district court abused its discretion when it imposed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Preston Adam JoyIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Boll v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Preston Adam JoyIdaho Supreme Court · 2013