Legal Opinion

State v. Ransom

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2002No. 27173PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HART, Judge Pro Tem.

Heath Cary Ransom appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence for voluntary manslaughter, I.C. § 18-4006(1). Ransom raises as issues whether: (1) the district court abused its discretion when it excluded expert testimony regarding the effects of intoxication on the human body; (2) I.C. § 18-116, which precludes consideration of voluntary intoxicated condition in determining criminal intent, is unconstitutional; (3) the district court erred in refusing to give an involuntary manslaughter instruction; and (4) the district court abused its discretion when it imposed…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Preston Adam JoyIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Boll v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. Preston Adam JoyIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API