Regan v. Denney
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Chief Justice.
Petitioner Brent Regan asserts that Idaho Code section 56-267, a statute enacted pursuant to the initiative power retained by the people of Idaho in Article III, section 1 of the Idaho Constitution, violates Idaho's Constitution by delegating future lawmaking authority regarding Medicaid expansion to the federal government. Regan requests that this Court declare section 56-267 unconstitutional and also requests that this Court issue a writ of mandamus directing the Secretary of State Lawerence Denney to remove section 56-267 from the Idaho Code. We dismiss *18Regan's…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School Dist 25Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Ybarra v. Legislature of the State of Idaho & ID Bd of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Idahoans for Open Primaries v. LabradorIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Babe Vote/League of Women Voters of Idaho v. McGraneIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
- Labrador v. Idahoans for Open PrimariesIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.