Legal Opinion

Regan v. Denney

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2019No. Docket No. 46545PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

Petitioner Brent Regan asserts that Idaho Code section 56-267, a statute enacted pursuant to the initiative power retained by the people of Idaho in Article III, section 1 of the Idaho Constitution, violates Idaho's Constitution by delegating future lawmaking authority regarding Medicaid expansion to the federal government. Regan requests that this Court declare section 56-267 unconstitutional and also requests that this Court issue a writ of mandamus directing the Secretary of State Lawerence Denney to remove section 56-267 from the Idaho Code. We dismiss *18Regan's…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School Dist 25Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Ybarra v. Legislature of the State of Idaho & ID Bd of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Idahoans for Open Primaries v. LabradorIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Babe Vote/League of Women Voters of Idaho v. McGraneIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Labrador v. Idahoans for Open PrimariesIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API