Legal Opinion

American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water Resources

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2007No. 33249, 33311, 33399PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

I

NATURE OF THE CASE

This appeal is in response to a district court decision finding the Rules for Conjunctive Management of Surface and Ground Water Resources (CM Rules or Rules) facially unconstitutional based on the court’s determination that the Rules lacked certain “procedural components” necessary to the proper administration of water rights under Idaho’s prior appropriation doctrine. The Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR), together with the Intervenors, Idaho Ground Water Appropriators, Inc. (IGWA), appeal from that decision.

II

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bonz v. SudweeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Thomson v. Idaho Insurance Agency, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Jou v. Dai-Tokyo Royal State Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Lochsa Falls, L.L.C. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API