Legal Opinion
St. Vincent Charity Hospital v. URS Consultants, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 1996No. 69504PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is before the court on the accelerated docket pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and LocApp.R. 25.
Defendants-appellants, URS Consultants (“URS”), and Zannoni Heckman and Payto Partnership, Inc. (“ZHP”), argue that the trial court erred by denying their joint motion to stay the proceedings pending arbitration. Plaintiff, St. Vincent Charity Hospital, Inc., responds that the trial court was correct because URS, not being a signatory to the contract, cannot enforce an arbitration clause in the contract. We affirm the judgment of the court below. The relevant facts follow.
St. Vincent contracted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Neubrander v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Teramar Corp. v. Rodier Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Didado v. Lamson & Sessions Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ambulatory Care Review Services v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Cleveland-Akron-Canton Advertising Cooperative v. Physician's Weight Loss Centers of America, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sasaki v. McKinnonOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bentley v. Cleveland Browns Football Co., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Owens Flooring Co. v. Hummel Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.