Legal Opinion

Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1980No. 79-310PublishedCited by 1,005 opinions

1Per curiam

The question now before this court is whether plaintiffs are entitled to a new trial, as the Court of Appeals determined, because a court reporter is unable to transcribe portions of trial testimony necessary to the proper presentation of assigned errors on appeal. Plaintiffs, of course, adopt this position. Conversely, defendants contend that, instead of granting a new trial, the Court of Appeals should have affirmed the judgments of the trial court on the basis that plaintiffs failed to provide a transcript of the trial proceedings for appellate review. For the following reasons we find…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SkaggsOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by1,005 opinions

  1. State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In re M.D.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. City of Columbus v. HodgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993

1,000 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API