Legal Opinion

Didado v. Lamson & Sessions Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1992No. 15273PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cacioppo, Judge.

In 1982, the appellees, John Didado et al., installed an energy management system in the factory of the appellant, Lamson & Sessions Company, pursuant to a written agreement. The agreement provided that the parties would equally split the savings brought about by the system. In 1985, the agreement was modified so that the appellees would be paid a flat rate of $2,000 per month.

In 1989, the appellant fell behind in the aforementioned monthly payments, resulting in the appellees’ efforts to regain possession of the system. When these efforts failed, the appellee filed a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibbons-Grable Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Siam Feather & Forest Products Co. v. Midwest Feather Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
  3. Independence Bank v. Erin MechanicalOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Council of Smaller Enterprises v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Neubrander v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Ambulatory Care Review Services v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Krafcik v. USA Energy Consultants, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Gaffney v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API