Sasaki v. McKinnon
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
James D. Sweeney, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants Ernest Sasaki, Kenneth Sano, and David Yamada appeal from the granting of defendant-appellee Ernst & Young’s 1 (“E & Y”) motion to stay litigation pending arbitration. For the reasons adduced below, we affirm.
A review of the record on appeal indicates that this case involves a shareholders’ derivative action pursuant to Civ.R. 28.1, brought by plaintiffs, who are shareholders of ABS Industries, Inc., 2 on behalf and for the benefit of ABS and its shareholders. E & Y, an international accounting firm, was retained to serve as outside…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Master Consolidated Corp. v. BancOhio National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Gibbons-Grable Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Siam Feather & Forest Products Co. v. Midwest Feather Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
- Didado v. Lamson & Sessions Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Divine Construction Co. v. Ohio-American Water Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wallace v. Ganley Auto GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Thomas v. HyundaiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Winters Law Firm, L.L.C. v. Caryn Groedel & Assocs., Co., L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hay v. Summit Funding, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- McGlumphy v. Richard T. Kiko Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.