Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Allstate Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1992No. Nos. 91-764 and 91-1042, and Nos. 91-2105 and 91-2333PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

*711I

Schaefer et al. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Case Nos. 91-764 and 91-1042

In determining that its decision was in conflict with Trupp, supra, Said, supra, and Roen, supra, the court of appeals requested that we answer the following questions:

“(1) whether a binding arbitration clause in an automobile insurance policy providing that an award not exceeding the limits of the Financial Responsibility Law of Ohio will not be subject to a trial de novo, is so fundamentally unfair as to be unconscionable; and
“(2) what effect a finding of unconscionability will have upon enforcement of an award made under a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mahoning County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Mahoning County TMR Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Board of Education v. Findlay Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Pepin v. American Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Taylor Building Corp. of America v. BenfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hayes v. Oakridge HomeOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Phoenix Insurance v. RosenIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API