Legal Opinion
Schaefer v. Allstate Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1992No. Nos. 91-764 and 91-1042, and Nos. 91-2105 and 91-2333PublishedCited by 135 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
*711I
Schaefer et al. v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Case Nos. 91-764 and 91-1042
In determining that its decision was in conflict with Trupp, supra, Said, supra, and Roen, supra, the court of appeals requested that we answer the following questions:
“(1) whether a binding arbitration clause in an automobile insurance policy providing that an award not exceeding the limits of the Financial Responsibility Law of Ohio will not be subject to a trial de novo, is so fundamentally unfair as to be unconscionable; and
“(2) what effect a finding of unconscionability will have upon enforcement of an award made under a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mahoning County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Mahoning County TMR Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Board of Education v. Findlay Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Pepin v. American Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Taylor Building Corp. of America v. BenfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Hayes v. Oakridge HomeOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Phoenix Insurance v. RosenIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.