Legal Opinion
Neubrander v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1992No. 15271PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cacioppo, Judge.
Appellant, David Neubrander, was employed by the appellee, Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“Dean Witter”), as an account executive from November 1985 to January 1989. To become a registered representative of Dean Witter, Neubrander completed an application for securities industry registration.
Contained in the subject registration form were two provisions which state as follows:
“I hereby apply for registration with the organizations and states indicated in item 10 as may be amended from time to time and, in consideration of each organizations and states receiving and considering my…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gibbons-Grable Co. v. Gilbane Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Didado v. Lamson & Sessions Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Jones v. U-Haul Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Featherstone v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Ball v. Ohio State Home Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Vanyo v. Clear Channel WorldwideOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.