Legal Opinion
Jenison v. Redfield
California Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1906No. L.A. No. 1685PublishedCited by 25 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngelloti, J.
This is an action for damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff, a landowner of Walnut Irrigation District, by reason of the failure and refusal of defendants, directors of said district, to distribute and apportion to him his proportion of the water of said district. Defendants had judgment, and plaintiff appeals from such judgment, and also from an order denying his motion for a new trial. »
Walnut Irrigation District is a public corporation organized under what is known as the Wright Act (Stats. 1887, p. 29) and the acts supplementary thereto. (See act of 1897, Stats. 1897, p.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by25 opinions
- Morrison v. Smith Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Whiteman v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- MacLay v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnson v. Arvin-Edison Water Storage DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.