Morrison v. Smith Bros., Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
These several actions were commenced to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of certain named persons. Briefly, and in substance, the complaints allege that the defendant district, organized under and pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Utility District Act (Stats. 1921, p. 245), and while acting within the scope of the powers therein conferred, had adopted and entered into a project known as the “Mokelumne River Project” as a part of its plan for the conveyance, sale and distribution of water to the inhabitants of the district; that in furtherance of said project it had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Davoust v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- State of California v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Wilson v. Hidden Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Peccolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- City of New Bedford v. New Bedford, Woods Hole & Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.