Legal Opinion

Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2008No. Agency T8366; CA A130508; SC S055356, S055361PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

This case arises from a dispute over an application filed by petitioner Ken-Wal Farms, Inc. (Ken-Wal) to change the points of diversion associated with water rights set forth in two water right certificates (8942 and 8943) that were issued in 1930 to the Fort Vannoy Irrigation District (district), of which Ken-Wal is a member. The issue on review is whether Ken-Wal is the “holder of any water use subject to transfer,” as that phrase is used in ORS 540.510(1), such that Ken-Wal has authority under that statute to change the points of diversion associated with the water rights established in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Gerald Hawkins v. Debra HaalandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API