Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Arvin-Edison Water Storage District

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 2009No. F056201PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LEVY, J.

Appellant, Randell Johnson, filed a class action complaint against respondent, Arvin-Edison Water Storage District (District), alleging that he, and a putative class of current and former District employees, had not been paid overtime and provided with meal breaks in accordance with the California Labor Code and the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) wage orders. The District demurred to the complaint on the ground that, as a public entity, it is exempt from the subject wage and hour statutes. The trial court agreed with the District and sustained the demurrer.

Appellant argues…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Salyer Land Co. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Sheppard v. North Orange County Regional Occupational ProgramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Pinder v. Employment Development DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
  4. CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS'ASSN. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Morales v. 22nd District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API