Legal Opinion

Rickman v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 13, 1998No. CA A92503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Petitioner moves for reconsideration of our order dismissing review of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision’s (Board) denial of a rerelease date and for an order holding the case in abeyance. We allow the motion to reconsider, adhere to our order dismissing review, and deny the motion to hold the case in abeyance.

Petitioner was convicted of murder, sentenced to life in prison, and eventually paroled. After finding that petitioner had violated the conditions of his parole, the Board revoked parole. On May 11,1995, the Board issued an order denying petitioner a rerelease date as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meadows v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Kessler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Luckey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Denham v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Woolstrum v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shawn Newcomb v. Jeff PremoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Roof v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Wilcox v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API