Legal Opinion

Roof v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 1999No. CA A101434Published

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Petitioner moves for reconsideration of our decision to dismiss his petition for judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. We dismissed the petition because we concluded that petitioner had failed to file a timely amended petition after the Board had issued a revised order on reconsideration. We grant petitioner’s motion and hold that the time period for filing an amended petition for judicial review does not begin to run until the Board disposes of a request for administrative review. Because the Board had not yet disposed of petitioner’s request for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denham v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Rickman v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API