Denham v. State Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.
Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole on administrative review, dated October 30, 1989, denying relief from an order of August 3, 1989, setting petitioner’s parole release date. The Board moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, because 1) petitioner failed to file his petition for judicial review within 60 days after the Board issued its August 3, 1989, order; and 2) the October 30, 1989, order attached to the petition for judicial review is an administrative decision and not a judicially reviewable order. We deny the motion.
Before a 1989 amendment, ORS…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. SCHRUNKOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Esperum v. Oregon Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Cruz v. Oregon State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Esperum v. Oregon Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Walker v. State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Owens v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Rickman v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Palacios v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Taylor v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Thompson v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.