Legal Opinion

Meadows v. Schiedler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 1996No. 96C-10289; CA A91807PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff appeals the sua sponte dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus. We reverse.

Plaintiff was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree and sodomy in the second degree and sentenced, in July 1993, to a period not to exceed five years on each conviction, to be served consecutive to each other. The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) set a release date of August 21,1995. In June 1995, Dr. Davis submitted a written report of his psychological evaluation of plaintiff. Davis concluded that he did not consider plaintiff to be “an imminent danger to the health and safety…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Peek v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Jones v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API