Legal Opinion
Woolstrum v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 29, 1996No. CA A86804PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Petitioner petitions for review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) denying rerelease on parole. We vacate the order and remand.
In 1985, petitioner was convicted of kidnapping in the first degree and attempted murder. At the time that he committed the offenses, he was employed by the Clackamas County Sheriffs office as a corrections officer. The trial court sentenced petitioner to two concurrent 20-year terms with a five-year minimum term for use of a firearm.
Petitioner was paroled in January 1993. As a condition of release, petitioner was required to follow…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. FarmerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Jenkins v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kessler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Gallant v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Rickman v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Mageske v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.