Legal Opinion

Shawn Newcomb v. Jeff Premo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 2, 2013No. 12-35418UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Shawn Newcomb appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging the revocation of his parole and denial of rere-lease. We review de novo the district court’s order denying habeas relief. Silva v. Woodford, 279 F.3d 825, 835 (9th Cir.2002). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Petitioner contends that the district court erred by finding his claim procedurally barred for failure to exhaust his state remedies, and further contends that Oregon’s procedural rule requiring prisoners to seek administrative review of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Walker v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Lee v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Benjamin Wai Silva v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newcomb v. PremoSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API