Legal Opinion

Luckey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 1997No. CA A92472 (Control) CA A93106PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) setting his parole release date and term of parole supervision. We dismiss the petition on the ground that the Board’s order is not subject to judicial review.

Petitioner was convicted of sodomy in the first degree in 1984 and sentenced to 20-years incarceration with a 10-year minimum sentence. Several months before his anticipated release date, the Board issued an order setting a release date of September 5,1996, with a 12-month period of supervised parole. That date was two days before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Bollinger v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Quintero v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Rickman v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Eads v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API