Legal Opinion

United States v. Bost

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 28, 1992No. ACM 29395PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES, Judge:

In this case we grapple with another aspect of the prosecution of larcenies of pay and allowances, proof of ownership of the property alleged to have been stolen. Sergeant Bost was convicted of two offenses, a false statement in connection with his certifications relating to eligibility for basic allowance for quarters (BAQ) at the rate paid to a person with dependents and a larceny of the same allowances over more than 8 and a half years.1 We were concerned about the adequacy of the evidence to show that Sergeant Bost was not entitled to the BAQ that he was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. ScolesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. DeanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MosleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. AntonelliU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. GuronU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. AndersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. BulgerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API