Legal Opinion

United States v. Antonelli

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 14, 1993No. ACM 28856 (f rev)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT UPON FURTHER REVIEW

LEONARD, Senior Judge:

Once again we consider whether a larceny of basic allowance for quarters (BAQ) can occur by a wrongful withholding. Appellant’s ease has been returned to us with instructions to reconsider our original opinion setting aside a portion of his larceny conviction.1 To decide this case, we must review military larceny law, statutory entitlement to pay allowances, regulatory provisions implementing the statutes, court decisions concerning the characteristics of allowances, and the applicability of bailment and wrongful conversion to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. SicleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. AntonelliUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. HubbardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. BuckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. FergusonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  2. United States v. AntonelliCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. GuronU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. StadlerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  5. United States v. FennerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API