United States v. Bulger
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLarson, Chief Judge
I join the majority in affirming the findings of guilty to Charge I and its specification, as I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant signed the document in question with full knowledge of the falsity of its contents and that he did so with the intent to deceive. Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM), Part IV, paragraph 31b. Likewise, I concur with the majority’s resolution of the third and fourth assignments of error.
However, I part company with the majority in its analysis and affirmance of Charge III and its specification, larceny of basic allowance for quarters (BAQ) and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CareyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. RobertsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. MosleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. WoottonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.