Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Dean

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 23, 1991No. ACM 28805PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LEONARD, Senior Judge:

We have granted appellant’s request that we reconsider his case. Our original decision 1 granted no relief and affirmed appellant’s findings of guilt and sentence.

In his request for reconsideration, appellant claims that, since we decided his case, we have issued two opinions which appear to conflict with our decision in his case. See United States v. Blackshire, 33 M.J. 501 (A.F.C.M.R.1991); United States v. Antonelli, ACM 28856, 1991 WL 85311 (A.F.C.M.R. 19 April 1991). He also claims that our opinion conflicts with United States v. Watkins, 32 M.J.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. HartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. SicleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. HubbardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. BuckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. ViveritoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. AntonelliU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. NeffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. PerkinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API