Legal Opinion
Fleur Du Lac Estates Ass'n v. Mansouri
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 2012No. C068693PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J.
After this court in an earlier writ proceeding directed the trial court to enter an order denying a petition to compel arbitration filed by plaintiff Fleur du Lac Estates Association (the Association) (see Mansouri v. Superior Court (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 633, 643 [104 Cal.Rptr.3d 824]), defendant Zari Mansouri sought attorney fees and costs from the Association on the theory that she was the prevailing party in the proceeding to compel arbitration. The trial court concluded that Mansouri’s fee motion and costs memoranda were untimely. Mansouri moved for reconsideration and,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winslow v. Harold G. Ferguson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Reese v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Otay River Constructors v. San Diego ExpresswayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Benjamin, Weill & Mazer v. KorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Branner v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific Corporate Group Holdings v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Arshonsky v. Kim, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz LLP v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Reynolds v. Auburn Country Villa HOA CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Robinson v. Kong CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021