Legal Opinion

Otay River Constructors v. San Diego Expressway

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 2008No. D049612PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

Where an action is brought solely to compel arbitration of contractual disputes between the parties, we conclude that (1) a party who succeeds in obtaining an order denying the petition to compel arbitration is a prevailing party in the action on the contract even though the merits of the parties’ underlying contractual disputes have not yet been resolved and (2) an order denying a request for costs and attorney fees under such circumstances is appealable as a “special order after final judgment” under Code of Civil Procedure section 1294, subdivision (e). (All statutory…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Food Safety Net Services v. Eco Safe Systems USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Phillips v. Sprint PCSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Turner v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API