Arshonsky v. Kim
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the Court
WEINGART, J.**
*900David Kim appeals following the denial of his petition to compel arbitration of a fee dispute with his former attorneys pursuant to the Mandatory Fee Arbitration Act (MFAA), Business and Professions Code section 6200, et seq. As described more fully below, the MFAA permits a client 30 days in which to request nonbinding arbitration by a local bar association of any dispute involving attorneys' fees or costs before a collection related matter can proceed. The trial court found Kim waived his right to arbitration under the MFAA by failing to request arbitration within the required…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Brock v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Perez v. GrajalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deck v. Developers Investment Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Soni v. SimpleLayers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Taylor v. Forde CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021