Legal Opinion
Branner v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 14, 2009No. C061476PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Defendants The Regents of the University of California (the Regents) and Barbara Horwitz have moved to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff George R. Branner on the ground that Branner’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Branner opposes the motion on the ground that his unsuccessful motion for reconsideration, filed in the trial court, extended his time to appeal. For reasons that follow, we shall dismiss the appeal.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Branner filed a complaint against the Regents and Horwitz, alleging various causes of action premised on allegations of race and age…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Reese v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Alioto Fish Co., Ltd. v. AliotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Payne v. RaderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Powell v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Judge v. Nijjar Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Conservatorship of the Person & Estate of TownsendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Fleur Du Lac Estates Ass'n v. MansouriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Mack v. All Counties Tr. Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.