Legal Opinion

Reese v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1999No. C029199PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KOLKEY, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Gerald Reese appeals from an order denying his motion for class certification in his action against defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and George Bronk, an employee at the Wal-Mart store located on Watt Avenue in Sacramento. Plaintiff argues that the trial court utilized improper legal criteria in denying his motion for class certification. We disagree and shall affirm.

In an appeal from a decision denying class certification, a reviewing court will “not disturb a trial court ruling on class certification which is supported by substantial evidence unless…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. America Online, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Angelucci v. Century Supper ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Rosales v. Citibank, Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  5. AREI II CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API