Legal Opinion
Pacific Corporate Group Holdings v. Keck
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 2014No. D062277PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AARON, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
Pacific Corporate Group Holdings, LLC (PCGH), brought this action against its former employee, Thomas Keck, seeking to collect on a promissory note. Keck defended against the action by claiming that any money that he owed PCGH was offset by monies that PCGH owed him. Keck also filed a cross-complaint against PCGH seeking damages for unpaid bonus and severance payments that he claimed were due him pursuant to two employment agreements. In a special verdict, the jury found that PCGH owed Keck $270,547.95 under the terms of a 2006 employment agreement (2006…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hirst v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Cox v. Bonni, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Balboa Capital Corporation v. Okoji Home Visits MHT LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
- Balboa Capital Corporation v. Okoji Home Visits MHT LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.