Legal Opinion

Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz LLP v. Kim

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 2019No. B289308Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/29/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE LEVINSON ARSHONSKY & B289308 KURTZ LLP, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. LC106289) v. DAVID KIM, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rupert A. Byrdsong, Judge. Dismissed. Law Office of Robert S. Myong and Robert S. Myong for Defendant and Appellant. Levinson, Arshonsky & Kurtz, Robert A. Levinson, and David Krol for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________ *…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API