Lamoreux v. Langlotz
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
This appeal raises two questions. The first is whether a developer’s suit to enforce restrictive covenants was premature. The second is whether the superior court erred in enforcing the covenants.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Appellee Robert J. Langlotz is the original subdivider of the Marian Hills Subdivision, which comprises about 20 acres of land in the Fairbanks recording district. In September 1984, he recorded restrictive covenants regulating the use of land in the subdivision.
The covenants restrict the subdivision to residential uses. The minimum dwelling size is 1,000…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Jefferson v. AsplundAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Hanebuth v. Bell Helicopter InternationalAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arizona Biltmore Estates Ass'n v. TezakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Ogle v. Craig Taylor Equipment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Kalenka v. TaylorAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Kohl v. LegoullonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Wright v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.