Jefferson v. Asplund
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
In his complaint below appellant primarily sought both declaratory and injunc-tive relief. On motion of appellees the superior court dismissed the complaint with prejudice. We have concluded that the lower court’s ruling was in part erroneous.
In 1959, our legislature implemented the judiciary article of the Alaska constitution by defining the jurisdiction of the superior court. 1 In so doing the legislature vested the superior court with authority to render declaratory judgments. This grant flowed from the following statutory provision:
In case of an actual…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- K & L DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. MurkowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.