Legal Opinion

Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1983No. 6786PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Chief Justice.

This appeal challenges the dismissal of appellants’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We reverse.

Lee Linck died on December 11,1978. At the time of Linck’s death, attorneys R.R. DeYoung and Barokas & Martin and accountant Earl L. Sommerfeld were in the process of developing an estate plan for him. This plan was never completed. Under Linck’s will, his entire estate, valued at three million dollars, passed to his wife, Gertrude Linck. The Linck children were beneficiaries only in the event that Gertrude Linck predeceased her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Alhino v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Dworkin v. First National Bank of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Shaw v. State, Department of Administration, Public Defender AgencyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Shaw v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Knight v. American Guard & Alert, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API