Legal Opinion

Kalenka v. Taylor

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1995No. S-5678PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Uwe Kalenka and his brother Ralf brought suit to enforce restrictive covenants which bind nine lots in a subdivision. The defendants are (1) Dorcas Teall, Uwe’s former wife, who sold four lots to a developer and approved construction on them; (2) William and Tami Taylor, d/b/a Colony Builders (collectively, the Taylors), who purchased Teall’s lots, built single family houses on them, and then resold the properties; and (3) seven people who purchased the properties from the Taylors and now live there (the residents). 1 The Kalenkas appeal from summary…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. NicholsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Oceanview Homeowners Ass'n v. Quadrant Construction & EngineeringAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. ARCO Alaska, Inc. v. AkersAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Walt v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Mat-Su Coalition for ChoiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Xco International Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pacific Scientific Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Ridgewood Homeowners Ass'n v. MignaccaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. Douglas Galipeau v. Briana Bixby and Mei-Lani BixbyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API