Legal Opinion

Kohl v. Legoullon

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1997No. S-7229, S-7239PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal involves issues relating to the enforcement of covenants setting height and setback restrictions on appellants Patrick and Thu Thi Kohls’ home. Appellees Roger and Sandra Legoullon seek to enforce either the height or setback restrictions against the Kohls, requiring them to remove the top floor of their house. The Kohls argue that they are not in violation of the height covenant, that they received a waiver of the setback covenant, that the Legoullons should be prevented by laches from enforcing the setback covenant, and that the superior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. E-Systems, Inc. v. Monitek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Klosterman v. Hickel Investment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Whitesides v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wasserman v. BartholomewAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API