Banbury v. Arnold
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This action is brought by respondent, who was the vendor in a contract for the sale of certain real estate, to enforce specific performance of the contract on the part of the appellant, who was the vendee.
There is an appeal by defendant from the judgment. A copy of the contract is attached to the complaint and made part of it. The contract shows that the plaintiff was a married woman and the wife of T. Banbury at the time she entered into it. There is no certificate of acknowledgment attached thereto, and no express allegation in the complaint that it -was acknowledged.
For grounds of reversal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Hutchinson v. AinsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Vassault v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Cooper v. PenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Cordano v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re McCueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Magee v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Shenners v. PritchardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.