Legal Opinion

Cordano v. Wright

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1911No. S.F. No. 5205PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was commenced by G. Cordano against John Wright and four others to recover damages for trespasses alleged to have been committed on plaintiff’s land and to enjoin the defendants from entering upon said land and committing further trespasses thereon. The allegation is that the defendants erected wire fences on the northerly and southerly sides of a sixty-foot strip running over plaintiff’s land from east to west. The defendants answered, denying the allegations of damage and alleging as an affirmative defense that the strip described in the complaint was and for many years had been…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. People v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. California Trust Co. v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Pettengill v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Stoneman v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API